Management styles
As a leader, there are four different
styles that you can use to make decisions for an organization. Leadership
behavior can be expressed along a line (The Tannenbaum-Schmidt Continuum),
ranging from “boss-centered”, where the leader sets the tasks, to
“subordinate-centered”, where the leader builds relationships among
subordinates
The Tannenbaum-Schmidt Continuum
Figure 1: https://slideplayer.com/slide/7658714/
Tell
The leader identifies problems, makes decisions and announces to subordinates, expects
implementation. The autocratic style in which the leader gives specific instructions and monitors staff
closely is most useful when the team cannot tackle the task unaided is
unwilling, new, or suffered a previous leader who allowed standards to
deteriorate. It is the style most people accept in a crisis
Sell
The leader still
makes decisions but attempts to overcome resistance through discussion&
persuasion.
A persuasive style, in which the leader gives clear direction and supervises
closely but also explains decisions, encourages suggestions, and supports
progress. It is most useful when motivation is lacking. It is also the best
style where a task is non-negotiable but where the team's motivation is vital
to achieving the results required. For this style to work well you need to Develop
team skills, monitor how those skills are implemented, Spend time with each
individual addressing standards, skills, and motivation, Monitor closely, and be
directive to keep performance to agreed standards
Consult
The leader identifies the problem and passes on the solving and decision-making to the
group. Presents it to the group. Listens to advice and suggestions before
making a decision. The manager presents a problem, get suggestions, makes the decision. This
is a collaborative style in which the leader discusses the task and listens to
the team's ideas, taking them into account as he or she makes the key
decisions. It is most useful when the team has sufficient skills and competence
to make a contribution but where the leader feels a need to retain control.
That need can result from an imbalance between the team's competence and the
risk involved in the task
Join
The leader defines the problem and passes on the solving and decision-making to the group.
Manager
permits subordinate to function within limits defined by superior a
facilitating style in which the leader allows the team maximum responsibility,
this is most useful when the team is competent and has a positive attitude
towards the task
Conclusion
Successful leaders know which behavior is the
most appropriate at a particular time. They shape their behavior after a
careful analysis of themselves, their subordinates, organization, and environmental
factors.
Reference
ACADEMIA, 2021. ACADEMIA. [Online]
Available at: https://www.academia.edu/11695751/Leadership_Decision_Making_Tell_Sell_Consult_Join
[Accessed 17 Dec 2021].
Cottrell,
D., 2021. RUGBY COACH WEEKLY. [Online]
Available at: https://www.rugbycoachweekly.net/rugby-coaching/team-management/management-style-coaching-tips/
[Accessed 17 Dec 2021].
SlidePlayer,
2021. SlidePlayer. [Online]
Available at: https://slideplayer.com/slide/7658714/
[Accessed 17 Dec 2021].
The Tannenbaum and Schmidt Continuum recognizes that the chosen leadership style depends on a variety of factors, including the leader's personality, the perceived qualities of subordinates. This model explains the choices facing leaders when it comes to decision-making. Good article.
ReplyDeleteThe servant-leader management style is effective in helping your team develop and advance professionally. It also helps create a strong bond between employee and manager and can promote greater trust, bonding, and collaboration.
ReplyDeleteTannenbaum and Schmidt's continuum-based theory suggests a range of styles ranging from autocratic to democratic, although not suggesting that any one style within the continuum is right or wrong.Good Knowledge and thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteAccording to Tannenbaum and Schmidt styles, successful leaders know which behavior is the most appropriate at a particular time. They shape their behavior after a careful analysis of self, their subordinates, organization, and environmental factors. A very good one.
ReplyDelete